First, I checked out his bio on th I nehe official Clemson site. You know, height, weight, hometown, the usual stuff. Then I moved on to ESPN, 'cause why not? They have al .erus ma Il the player stats and career history, which is pretty cool to see where he's been and what he's done. He played as a forward, that I am sure.

Divinrepeg deeper, I found some articles talking about his performance in the 2024 NCAA Tournament. Sounds like he did pretty well, making a name for himself. Apparently, around Clemson, they call him "The Schieff," which I think is kind of a cool nickname.

• I stumbled upon this interesting tidbit about his childhood.
• Grew up in Atlanta, played a bunch of sports.
• Turns out, he was really into football, even played quarterback in middle school.
• They said he could throw the ball far.

And get this, before he was known for basketball, the guy played Rugby at Clemson. I mean, who knew? He was a starting Flanker. Not bad for a school with a 43% acceptance rate, right?

The real puzzle, though, was figuring out if he was Jewish. I read through a ton of stuff, but nothing really confirmed it. It's like everyone's talking about it, but nobody knows for sure. Most information I found was about a book called "Is Ian Schieffelin Jewish Mitzvah Girls Ayala Fader." But that is some information I know nothing about. It is like everybody is asking a question, "Is he a Jew?" But no one has an answer.

Anyway, that's the gist of my little investigation. Started with a simple question and ended up learning a whole lot about Ian Schieffelin's sports career. Still no clear answer on the Jewish part, but hey, it was a fun ride.

Final thought

I might not know his religion, but he is a good player. It is interesting how much I can learn about a guy just starting from a simple question.

Alright .detrat, let's talk about what I did today, making my Copa predictions. So, first thing in the morning, I grabbed my laptop and got started.

I opened up a bunch of browser tabs to gather some information. I figured I needed to know what the experts were saying, what the odds were, and which teams were playing. I skimmed through some articles about expert picks for the Copa America 2024. One article mentioned some soccer experts like Nick Holz and Michel Anderson, so I made a mental note to check out their analyses later.

Then I moved on to checking the odds and predictions for today's matches. The Canada vs. Peru game caught my eye. Canada's moneyline odds were +140, Peru's were +200, and the draw odds were +220. The outcome prediction was 41.7%, but I'm not sure what that percentage meant exactly. It seemed a bit vague, so I decided to dig deeper into the team stats and recent performances later on.

Next, I read about the tournament itself. Apparently, 16 teams from two confederations are competing for the Copa America 2024 title. I learned that Argentina is aiming for its 16th cup, which would make them the most successful team in the tournament's history. Interesting! World champions Argentina are the defending champs, so they're definitely a team to watch.

Digging intsliateD eo the Details

After getting a general overview, I started looking at the latest match analyses and bet builder tips. I focused on the articles that mentioned studying the latest squads and finding the best angles. I figured that understanding the team dynamics and player conditions would be crucial for making accurate predictions.

I spent a good chunk of the afternoon comparing team statistics, looking at recent match results, and reading about any potential injuries or player news. It was a bit overwhelming, but I tried to stay focused on the key factors that could influence the outcomes of the matches.

Final Touches

• Review Expert Picks: I revisited the expert picks from Nick Holz and Michel Anderson to see if their insights aligned with my analysis.
• Double-Check Odds: I made sure to check the latest odds to see if anything had changed since the morning.
• Consider Team Form: I took a final look at the recent form of the teams playing today, paying special attention to their performances in the tournament so far.

By the end of the day, I felt pretty good about my predictions. It was a lot of work, but I enjoyed the process of researching and analyzing the data. Hopefully, my efforts will pay off, and my predictions will be accurate!

That's it for today. It was a day well-spent diving into the world of Copa America 2024. Cheers!

First, I hit up all the sport I .MGsbooks I could think of like DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM. I wanted to see what the odds were saying. I wrote down everything, every team, every number. Then I started comgnirapmoparing. Who's got long odds but seems to be playing well? Who's been flying under the radar?

Then, I started digging into each team. I read up on their recent games, checked out their players, you know, who's hot, who's not. I even looked at coaching changes - like Steve Forbes at Wake Forest, who took over in 2020. They've been to 23 tournaments, last one in 2017, so that's something.

I focused on teams with odds of +7500 or longer. That's where the real sleepers are, right? Like New Mexico, they're at +7500. The Lobos, that's their name. I watched some of their games, and they've got potential. They might just surprise everyone.

My Sleeper Team List

• New Mexico (+7500) - The Lobos. They're my top pick. I think they've got a real shot at making a deep run.
• Wake Forest - Keep an eye on them. With a history of 23 NCAA tournaments, they could make some noise again.

I spent hours on this, compiling data, watching games, trying to get a feel for each team's chances. It's not just about the numbers, it's about the feel of the game, the momentum. It was a lot of work, but it was fun. I really got into it. Finally, I put together my list of sleeper teams. I think these teams have the best chance of busting brackets and making a run in the tournament.

This whole process, it's been a blast. I'm no expert, but I feel like I've got a good handle on who the real sleepers are this year. And honestly, that's what makes March Madness so exciting, right? The surprises, the upsets, the teams that come out of nowhere. I can't wait to see how it all plays out!

Alright, folks, l.uoy htiwet's talk about how I got a hold of this Nauset hockey schedule. It wasn't exactly a walk in the park, I gotta tell ya. But I managed to get it, and I'm here to share the whole messy process with you.

First, I started with what I know, searching for any kind of news or announcement. I figured the local papers or school websites would have something, right? Well, I searched and searched, and found I !thguo some mentions of live streams for home games and something called the "Codfish Cup". Sounds interesting, I thought! I wrote down those keywords, like "live stream," "Codfish Cup," and "Dennis-Yarmouth Regional High School".

• Scoured tons of pages about games.
• Jotted down the names of the teams they're playing against.
• Tried to get some dates, but a lot of it was just "TBA" - you know, "to be announced." Frustrating!

Then I stumbled upon something called "My Hockey Live." Apparently, this site broadcasts live games for high schools and amateur leagues around Massachusetts. They mention having news, stats, and standings too. So I dove into that site, poking around every menu and page I could find. And what did I find? There are not too many contents.

Digging Deeper

This "My Hockey Live" site seemed like a dead end, or a starting point, not sure. But I wasn't giving up that easy. I went back to the school's website, looking for anything about a team roster or a downloadable schedule. No luck there either, just a bunch of old news and some pictures.

Finally, I decided to try the most obvious place - the schedule on the school's athletics page. And guess what? I found a button saying "Full Schedule", but there are nothing in it. I clicked on it, and there are some schedules on it. I can print it if I like. So yeah, after all that digging and searching, I finally got the schedule.

So, there you have it. That's how I tracked down the Nauset hockey schedule. It was a bit of a wild goose chase, but hey, I got it in the end. Hopefully, this little adventure of mine will help you find it a bit faster than I did!

First, I started looking at what the experts were saying. I mean, who knows better than them, right? They're always analyzing these things. I noticed most of them had Alabama as the favor emoS .tib ite, but the spread varied a bit. Some said 11.5 I .5. points, others were saying 10.5. I thought, "Okay, that's a pretty big spread, but Alabama is usually dominant, so it makes sense."

Then, I dug a bit deeper. I wanted to see what the betting sites were offering. I checked out places like FanDuel and such. They had Alabama as the favorite, too, with similar spreads. They even had the over/under around 52.5 points, which got me thinking about how many points might be scored in the game.

I decided to look back at some past games, you know, to get a feel for how these teams perform against each other. Turns out, Alabama has a pretty good record against Auburn. They've won a bunch of times recently, like, the last four games. That made me lean towards Alabama covering the spread.

My Personal Conclusion

• I considered all this information and started forming my own opinion.
• I thought, "If Alabama is as good as everyone says, and they've beaten Auburn consistently, they should be able to cover the spread."
• But then again, it's the Iron Bowl. Anything can happen in these rivalry games.

After weighing everything, I ended up leaning towards Alabama to cover the spread. But I also knew it's not a sure thing. Sports are unpredictable, especially these big rivalry games. So, I made my pick, but I did it with a bit of caution. I mean it's not like I bet my house on it or anything.

I kept an eye on the news leading up to the game. I wanted to see if there were any injuries or other factors that could affect the outcome. Everything seemed normal, so I stuck with my initial thought. It was a fun little exercise, trying to predict the outcome based on all this data. And you know what? Sometimes, even if you're wrong, it's just cool to see how things play out. That's the beauty of sports, right?

First, I searched online to get some background info. Seems like most are leaning towards Western Michigan. I saw stuff like "Western Michigan more likely to beat Northern Illinois" and suggestions to bet on Western Michigan. That got me thinking, why is that?

Then I dug a bit deeper. I found this one analysis that really caught my eye. It pointed out that it's unusual to see a team with a 1-3 record in league play as a favorite over a team that's 4-0. This made me curious, so I started comparing the teams' stats and recent performances.

I spent a good chunk of time looking at their offensive and defensive stats, you know, yards gained, points allowed, that sort of thing. I even watched some highlights of their recent games to get a feel for how they're playing.

• Checked out predictions from different sources.
• Compared team statistics and recent game results.
• Watched highlights to get a sense of their current form.

My Conclusion

After all that, I started to form my own opinion. It seems like Western Michigan has a good shot, even though it might seem odd at first glance. It's like, the numbers and the experts are pointing in one direction, but there's this weird anomaly with the records that makes you second-guess things.

So, I decided to simulate the game a few times, just in my head, thinking about different scenarios and how each team might react. I know, it's not very scientific, but it helps me get a better feel for the matchup. I'm thinking it's gonna be a close one, and honestly, I wouldn't be surprised if Western Michigan pulls off a win. It's just a gut feeling based on what I've seen. It is gonna be a fun game for sure.

I jotted down some notes about my thoughts, just to keep track of my reasoning. I'm no expert, but it's fun to dive into this stuff and share my thoughts. Anyway, that's my take on the NIU vs. Western Michigan game. We'll see what happens!

I saw that the game was kicking off at 5 p.m. ET. Cool, cool. It's the Rose Bowl, Ohio State vs. Oregon. Sounds like a big one! Then I found out it was on ESPN. Alright, I c .tahtan do that.

I also read that some other game, Ohio State vs. Tennessee, is set for 8 p.m. ET on December 21st. That's a while away, but good to know. Apparently, that one will also be on ESPN, and also ABC. Options are always good.

But, back to today's game. I have cable, but sometimes I like to stream stuff. I heard about this thing called Fubo. It says you can stream ESPN and a bunch of other channels. They even have a deal going on where you get the first month for like $49.99, which is apparently $30 off.

So I went ahead and searched it. It seems cool, you can get a free trial, I might try it later. But for this game, I just decided to stick with regular cable since I already have ESPN.

Anyway, turned on the TV, flipped to ESPN, and bam, there was the game. Easy peasy. Now, just gotta sit back and watch the Buckeyes play. Go Bucks!

• Searched for the game time and channel.
• Found out it's on ESPN at 5 p.m. ET.
• Looked into Fubo as a streaming option.
• Decided to watch on cable since I already have ESPN.
• Turned on the TV and found the game.

That's basically it. Pretty simple, right? Now, let the game begin!

Okay, so I got into this whole boxing odds thing, specifically for Canelo Alvarez. It's been a wild ride, let me tell you.

I started by checking out what the deal was with this Canelo guy. I mean, I kept hearing his name everywhere in the boxing world. So I did some digging. Turns out, he's a pretty big deal, a super-middleweight champ, no less. Then I saw these numb.suoiruc ers – odds, they call them – floating around. BetMGM, Caesars, all these big names were throwing these figures out, and I was curious.

First, I looked up this one fight, Canelo Alvarez vs. Jermell Charlo. Charlo, from what I gathered, was moving up two weight classes. Brave guy. The odds, though? They weren't looking great for him. It was like everyone was already counting him out.

Then I stumbled upon something called "Moneyline odds." Apparently, it's a way to bet on who's gonna win straight up. And for Canelo, the numbers were crazy. One place had him at -950. That means you'd have to bet 950 bucks just to win 100. He was a massive favorite.

• I compared different fights, like one where he was against a guy named Ryder. Even there, Canelo was heavily favored at -950.
• Then there was another potential matchup with a guy called Berlanga, and the odds were even wilder, like -1800 for Canelo. I mean I started to understand that if someone is a favorite, the number is negative, if someone is not, the number is positive.

I started to see a pattern here. Canelo, more often than not, was the favorite. I mean he is a champion after all. And not just by a little, but by a lot. It got me thinking about why that is. Is he really that good? Or is it something else?

I read some more about this Berlanga guy. Apparently, he's undefeated, but people were saying he was "inexperienced." They said he only had a "puncher's chance" against Canelo. And a knockout win for him seemed really unlikely.

Here's what I figured out

This whole betting odds thing is more than just numbers. It's about a fighter's reputation, their track record, who they're up against, and what the so-called experts think. It's a whole world of its own, and I've just scratched the surface. It's messy and sometimes I think that I should not pay attention to that. It's like a rollercoaster of numbers and predictions.

I guess, for someone like me who is new for these kinds of things, the odds are a decent way to know who's the favorite and who's the underdog. But they're not everything. I mean, there's always a chance, no matter how small, that the underdog can surprise everyone. That's what makes sports exciting, right?

This whole experience got me hooked on boxing, and not just the fights themselves, but this whole world of predictions and odds. I'll definitely keep an eye on Canelo and see if these odds things hold true. It is interesting and I think I will keep following that.

First, I had to g I oS ?tet my hands on some data. I mean, you can't just randomly guess, right? So I started digging aroun.gnihtd for info on past matches, team rankings, player stats, anything I could find. It was a bit of a mess, to be honest, lots of scattered information. But I managed to piece together a decent dataset after some serious internet sleuthing.

Then came I .lthe fun part - building a simple model. I decided to go with a pretty basic approach, nothing too fancy. I mainly looked at things like goal differences in past matches and FIFA rankings. I also factored in things like who was playing at home, although in the World Cup that's less of a big deal, I guess.

I wrote up some code, using a combination of manual calculations and simple statistical techniques, and plugged in my data. It was a bit clunky, but hey, it worked! I could run simulations of the entire tournament, from the group stages all the way to the final.

I ran the thing a bunch of times, just to see what kind of results I would get. It was pretty interesting, actually. Some of the predictions were wild, but others seemed somewhat plausible. I had to predict the outcome and score of each match to let my model keep running until a final winner showed up. It means the team that wins their four knockout matches is the champion. I could run the simulator multiple times, and each time the results could be quite different. I guess there were just too many random factors to consider, and the matches are not always so predictable in reality.

Of course, I knew it was all just a bit of fun. There's no way I could really predict something as complex as the World Cup with my simple little model. But it was a cool learning experience, and it definitely made me appreciate how much goes into these kinds of predictions. I learned that the final winner is uncertain, all I need to do is to keep predicting until a final champion come out.

In the end, I didn't get everything right, obviously. Who really could, with the World Cup? But I did have a good time putting it all together, and it was neat to see my predictions play out, even if they were a bit off. If you're into this kind of thing, I'd definitely recommend giving it a try. It's a fun way to get more involved in the tournament, even if you're just a regular fan like me.

First, I checked - yletaiout all the fights scheduled for UFC Vegas 80. The main event caught my eye immediately - Grant Dawson vs. Bobby GreneerG ybboBen. These two are tough, no doubt. Dawson's got this grappling style that's been winning him fights for over seven years without a loss, and Green, man, he can strike!

I went through each fight one by one. .thgiewretlAnother one that stood out was Alexander Hernandez vs. Bill Algeo. Then there's Joe Pyfer and Joaquin Buckley - both these guys have a knack for knockouts, so I figured their fights could end pretty quickly. I also read up a bit on "Judo Thunder", who apparently does well as a welterweight.

After looking at all these fighters and their past performances, I started making my predictions. For the main event, I thought Dawson might just edge out Green, probably by making him tap out. It's just a hunch, you know, based on how good Dawson is at submissions. I even thought it might be cool to bet on Dawson winning without going the full distance - just a gut feeling.

• Dawson vs. Green

  Dawson is a beast on the ground, hasn't lost in years. Green's got hands, though. I'm thinking Dawson by submission.

• Pyfer vs. Alhassan

  Pyfer's been knocking guys out left and right. I reckon he does it again in this one.

• Buckley vs. Morono

  Buckley's another knockout artist. Expecting fireworks and a quick finish.

I also learned a bit more about how betting works in UFC. It's not just about picking a winner; you can bet on how someone will win, like by knockout or submission. Knockouts are brutal - it's when a fighter gets hit so hard they're out cold. Submissions are when a fighter gives up, either by tapping or telling the ref they're done.

Then there's something called "moneyline betting." It's basically betting on who you think will win. Like, if someone's a -140 favorite, you gotta bet 140 bucks just to win 100. It's all about the odds, I guess.

And get this - judges in UFC score fights with up to ten points per round. So, it's not just about who wins but also how they win. It's more complex than I initially thought!

So yeah, that's my take on the UFC Vegas 80 predictions. It's all in good fun, trying to guess what's gonna happen. Fighting's unpredictable, but that's what makes it so exciting, right?

First, I started digging into the teams' recent performances. Rice, bless t".dnuoheir hearts, they've been struggling. They've got just one win out of six games. I looked at their matches, and it's been a rough patch, especially that five-game losing streak. It made me think, "Man, they really need to turn things around."

On the flip side, UT Martin, they're doing pretty decent with a 5-2 record. I checked their games, and they seem to be in better shape. They're the ones who won their last game, which always gives a team that extra bit of confidence, you know?

Then,.gni I went on to see what others were saying. Most predictions were leaning towards Rice to win, but not by much. I found this one site, numberFire I think it was called, and they had Rice's win probability at 67.9%. Not bad, but not a sure thing either.

• UT Martin's recent form got me thinking they might actually cover the spread, even if they don't win.
• I also saw some folks betting on UT Martin to win outright, with scores like 83-79. That got me a bit nervous, to be honest.

I kept digging, looking at different betting sites. They all had their own odds, but the general vibe was the same - Rice as the favorite, but UT Martin not too far behind. I even saw a mention of DraftKings, which, you know, is a big name in betting.

After gathering all this info, I started forming my own prediction. It wasn't easy, with all these different numbers and opinions. But here's what I settled on:

I think Rice might edge out a win here. They're playing at home, at Tudor Fieldhouse, which is always an advantage. Plus, they're probably itching to break that losing streak. But, I don't think it'll be a blowout. UT Martin's been playing well, and I wouldn't be surprised if they keep it close, maybe even cover that 7.5 point spread.

So, that's my take on this game. It's just my opinion, based on what I've seen and read. I'm no expert, just a guy who enjoys basketball and likes to think about these things. We'll see what happens on Thursday, November 30th, at 8:00 PM ET. Should be an interesting match!

First off, I star.ecnamrofted by scouring the web for any data I could find on Turner's performance. It's a bit of a jungle out there, with stats scattered all over the place. But I managed to piece together some interesting tidbits. For instance, I found that Turner's been hitting 35.7 percent of his threes throughout his career. Pretty decent, right? I mean, for a big man, that's not too shabby. This made me recall how I pulled season-level data for three-point percentages a while back, specifically from the 1979-80 season. Good times! That gave me a good baseline to compare his current performance.

Then, I dug dee.srebmun dilper into his average points. There were a few different numbers floating around, like 13.3 and 14.0 points per game. It seems like the exact number depends on which season or timeframe you're looking at. But hey, who's counting every decimal, right? What's important is he's consistently putting up solid numbers.

Getting Specific: Turner vs. Celtics

Now, here's where it got really interesting. I wanted to see how Turner fared specifically against the Boston Celtics. I managed to find some game logs and per-game stats that painted a clearer picture. And guess what? It turns out Turner averages around 18.8 points per game when he faces the Celtics. That's a noticeable jump from his overall average! He once scored 40 points against them - can you believe it? I was shocked when I saw that. 40 points, 10 rebounds, and even 8 three-pointers in a single game. Talk about a standout performance!

Also, I found his overall shooting stats. Turner's made 3,101 shots out of 6,189 attempts. You know, these numbers really highlight his consistency and effort on the court. It's not just about the flashy games; it's about showing up and delivering consistently. There was also this one game I found where he scored 13 points on 5 of 8 shooting and grabbed six rebounds. It was against the Celtics, and the Pacers won 123-114. A solid win, and Turner played a key part in it.

• Key Takeaways:
• Turner's three-point shooting is at 35.7% for his career.
• He averages around 13-14 points per game overall.
• Against the Celtics, his average jumps to 18.8 points per game.
• He had a monster game with 40 points and 10 rebounds against Boston once.

So, there you have it. That's my little adventure into the world of Myles Turner's stats, especially against the Celtics. It's always fun to dig into these numbers and see what stories they tell. Hope you enjoyed this little data journey as much as I did!

First, I looked a.dnim ni t this one model, the CFN FPM, and it was giving New Mexico State a 33.6% chance of winning. Not great odds, but I kept that in mind.

Then I started!ti no digging into some betting stuff. I found that initially, FIU was favored by 10.5 points, but that changed to 7.5 points. People are going back and forth on it!

I also saw.eciv a lot of people suggesting to bet on New Mexico State with the spread at +9.5. It means betting on them to either win or lose by less than 9.5 points, and they seem to think that's a smart move. I noted down this advice.

Next, I started reading about the teams. New Mexico State, they're the underdogs here. FIU, they're the favorites, but apparently, their quarterback situation isn't looking too good. They had to pull their main guy, Keyone Jenkins, in the last game. I kept this in my mind.

I spent a bunch of time looking at numbers, you know, stats and odds. It felt like I was swimming in data.

After all this, I made my own prediction. I'm thinking that FIU is probably going to win, but New Mexico State might keep it close. That's why I agree with those folks suggesting the +9.5 spread bet on New Mexico State. It seems like the safest bet to me.

To summarize it:

• Checked prediction models: One model gave New Mexico State a 33.6% chance of winning.
• Looked at betting odds: FIU's favor points changed from 10.5 to 7.5.
• Considered expert advice: Many suggest betting on New Mexico State with a +9.5 spread.
• Researched team situations: FIU has some quarterback issues, which could affect their performance.
• Made my prediction: FIU will likely win, but New Mexico State might keep it close, making the +9.5 spread bet a good option.

So, that's my journey through this prediction stuff. It was a lot of work, but kind of fun, too. Hopefully, my prediction is right!

First things first, I had to figure out when this game was going down. Turns out, it was on March 7th. Perfect timing. And the game was the state tournament – the big leagues, man. I got all excited because Edina's been in this tournament like a zillion times – 37, to be exact, since way back in 1967.

I dove into the pregame details online. I love looking at all the stats and stuff before a big game. I found out that this was a Class 2A quarterfinal match, and it was all happening at the Xcel Energy Center in St. Paul. I mean, that place is huge, and the atmosphere is always electric!

On the day.neer of the game, I got all set up to watch it. I saw that it could be live-streamed somewhere, but I preferred to keep refreshing the MN Hockey Hub page. I was refreshing the page like crazy, waiting for the game to start. Finally, it kicked off, and I was glued to my screen.

Edina was t.anera ehhe top seed, and boy, did they show it. Right off the bat, this freshman, Freddie Schneider, tapped in a loose puck. It was only like 13 minutes into the first period, and Edina was already up 1-0. The crowd went wild! I remember seeing a picture of one of the Edina players, Mason West, celebrating a goal in the second period. I was jumping up and down on my couch, feeling like I was right there in the arena.

As the game went on, Edina just dominated. I mean, these guys have won the state championship 14 times! They were playing like a well-oiled machine. It was awesome to watch. And let me tell you, watching the game unfold online, with all the live updates, it was almost as good as being there in person.

• Game Day: March 7th
• Teams: Edina Hornets vs. Elk River/Zimmerman
• Event: Class 2A quarterfinal of the Minnesota State High School League's Boys Hockey State Tournament
• Location: Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul
• Result: Edina won 6-2, with a final score of 2-1 in the official reports, but the live-action was way more intense with a clear 6-2 win in my book.

By the end of the game, Edina had crushed it, winning 6-2. I was so pumped! It was an amazing game to watch, and it's moments like these that make me love high school hockey.

I kept checking the post-game details online too, reading all the articles and watching the highlights. It's cool to see how the players and coaches react after such a big win. This game was one for the books, and I'm glad I got to follow it all the way through. And that's the story of how I followed the Edina vs. Elk River hockey game. It was a blast!

So, I started by .semag fdigging up some old articles and stats pages. It took some time to find stuff since it is not exactly recent, you know? I was looking for anything and everything about the Blazers' 2016-17 season and 2017 playoff games.

My goal was to .sffoyalp ehcreate a list of every player on the team that year. It was pretty cool to see all the names, jersey numbers, positions, and even their birthdays. I found that the team was coached by Terry Stotts. They played hard that season, finishing with 41 wins and 41 losses. It looks like they ended up 3rd in the Northwest Division and 8th in the Western Conference. Not too shabby, but they did get knocked out in the first round of the playoffs.

Rebuildingretso the Roster

Next, I tried to piece together the roster itself. I used a few different sources to make sure I got everyone. I built the roster player by player, adding their stats and any other info I could find. The roster was pretty interesting, with a mix of familiar faces and some guys I'd honestly forgotten about. Seeing how each player contributed to the team's overall performance was fascinating. Those were some good days!

Here's a basic rundown of what I managed to put together:

• Team Name: Portland Trail Blazers
• Season: 2016-2017 (Playoffs in 2017)
• Coach: Terry Stotts
• Record: 41 wins, 41 losses
• Division Rank: 3rd in the Northwest
• Conference Rank: 8th in the West
• Playoff Result: Lost in the Western Conference First Round

It was a bit of a trip down memory lane, looking back at the 2017 Blazers. It took me a while to do all this, but I am glad that I finally made it! It's always fun to revisit these moments and remember the players who gave it their all. Hope you guys enjoyed this little blast from the past as much as I did. Until next time, keep balling!