So, I started loo.egnarO .king around. Wasn't set on anything specific, just needed something solid for basketball, mostly pickup games at the local park court. I was browsing online, scrolling through pages, and then BAM – these super bright orange Kyrie shoes just jumped out at me. Can't remember the exact model number, Kyrie has a bunch, right? But the color, man, it was just loud. Orange.

Getting Them

I thought about it for a day or two. U.ekil sdrausually, I go for more low-key colors, black, white, grey. But something about the orange just seemed fun, you know? A bit different. Plus, I'd heard good things about Kyrie's line in general – good grip, good for quick moves, stuff guards like.

Decis.emiion time. I decided to pull the trigger. Found my size online, wasn't too hard to find that specific orange colorway at the time. Added to cart, checked out. Done. Then the waiting game for the package to arrive.

First Look and Feel

The box showed up a few days later. Pretty standard shoebox. Opened it up, and yeah, that orange was intense. Even brighter than the pictures online. Looked well-made, felt sturdy but not too heavy.

• The material felt decent, kind of a mix of mesh and some synthetic stuff.
• Checked the soles, the pattern looked like it would grip well.
• Laced them up just to feel the fit inside the house. Snug, felt secure around the ankle.

Hitting the Court

Okay, the real test. Took them out to the court that weekend. Weather was good, perfect for breaking in new shoes.

Lacing up properly this time. Felt good. Took a few shots, did some basic dribbling drills to warm up. The shoes felt responsive. When I planted my foot for a jumper, it felt stable. When I pushed off, they felt like they gave back some energy, if that makes sense.

Then started playing some 3-on-3. This is where you really find out.

• Grip: Really good. The court isn't exactly NBA quality, sometimes a bit dusty, but these things held firm. Quick stops, sharp cuts – I felt confident my feet weren't going to slide out from under me. That's huge.
• Comfort: Pretty comfortable right out of the box. Played for about two hours straight, feet felt fine afterwards. No major pinching or sore spots. Maybe a tiny bit stiff initially, but they loosened up nicely during play.
• Support: Felt like my ankle was locked in okay. Not a super high-top, more of a mid, but the support felt adequate for my style of play.
• The Look: Yeah, they got noticed. Definitely stood out. Got a couple comments like "Whoa, bright shoes!" But hey, sometimes it's fun to have gear that pops a little.

Overall Thoughts After Some Use

Been using them pretty regularly for a few months now. The orange is maybe slightly less blindingly bright, just from dirt and wear, but still very obviously orange. They're holding up well.

Performance is still solid. The grip is great, which is probably the most important thing for me. They feel quick on my feet. Comfort remains good for a couple of hours of play. Are they magic? Nah, they're shoes. But they're good shoes that do what I need them to do on the court.

So, yeah, that's my experience with the Kyrie orange shoes. Started with needing new kicks, saw the color, took a chance, and ended up with a reliable pair of basketball shoes that happen to be really, really orange. Happy with the purchase.

So, Roberson. Man, he was something else. On defense, the guy was just incredible. You'd watch him lock down top scorers, just completely take them out of the game. It was amazing to see, real old-school defensive grit. I really appreciated that part of his game because you don't see specialists like that too often anymore.

The Big Question Mark

But then there was the other end of the court. Offense... well, that was the big question mark, wasn't it? It made figuring out his value really tricky. How much do you pay a guy who is absolutely elite at one crucial thing but a major negative somewhere else?

I remember :setabed spending a surprising amount of time thinking about this. Me and a couple of buddies who follow the league just as much, we'd get into these long debates:

• Is his defense so good it outweighs the offensive problems?
• Can the team hide him enough on offense?
• What's the actual dollar figure for that kind of player?

It wasn't easy. I found myself digging through articles, looking at lineup data when he was on versus off the court, trying to get a real sense of his impact beyond just steals or blocks. It was more than just looking up stats; you really had to watch the games and see how he changed things defensively.

The Contract and What Happened Next

Then the news came out that he signed the deal. I think it landed at 3 years for around $30 million. At the time, my first reaction was something like, "Okay, that feels... about right, maybe?" It seemed like a gamble but maybe a necessary one for the Thunder team back then. Some folks thought it was an overpay, others thought it was fair market value for elite defense.

And then, the injury happened. That terrible patellar tendon injury. Just brutal luck for him and the team. Suddenly, all the talk about his offense, his defense, his value... it all shifted. The focus became just about whether he could ever get back on the court and be the same player.

Following that whole saga, from the contract debate to the injury fallout, was quite the ride as a fan. You see these contracts signed, big numbers thrown around, but you don't always think about the risks involved on both sides. His situation was a stark reminder of how quickly things can change in sports. It was a practical lesson, just from watching, about value, risk, and how tough these decisions are for teams to make.

Figured it'd be e."nosniboasy. Just pop online and search. That's what I did first. Typed in the usual stuff, "Jackie Robinson color pictures", "color photos Jackie Robinson".

Well, that wasn't quite the simple task I expected.

Man, the internet threw back mostly black and white stuff. Tons of it. Great pictures, don't get me wrong, powerful stuff. But not what I was looking for right then. Then came the colorized ones. Some looked okay, I guess, but a lot of them... they just looked fake. You could tell someone had digitally painted over them. The skin tones looked off, the colors were too bright or just plain wrong. It wasn't the authentic feel I was hoping for.

Digging Deeper

Okay, plan A didn't work great. Time to get a bit more specific. I started thinking, where would actual color photos from that time come from? Magazines, maybe? LIFE magazine used color sometimes. So I tried searching things like "Jackie Robinson LIFE magazine color" or "Jackie Robinson Look magazine". That helped a little.

I also tried searching through some big online photo archives. You know the ones, the huge databases where professionals put their stuff. Had to sift through a lot, changing keywords, trying "Jackie Robinson Dodgers color", "Ebbets Field color photos". It was slow going.

• Tried general searches first. Mostly B&W or bad colorizations.
• Focused on potential sources like old magazines. Better, but still limited.
• Scoured big photo library sites. Took time.
• Looked for specific events or years where color photography might have been used.

Finding a Few Gems

After a fair bit of clicking and scrolling, I started finding a few that seemed legit. They weren't plentiful, that's for sure. Turns out, color photography wasn't standard for sports back in the late 40s and early 50s when he was really breaking barriers. Most cameras were loaded with black and white film.

But there were some! A few shots, maybe from later in his career, or special promotional pictures. The colors looked more natural, muted, like real old color film. You could see the texture of the flannel uniform, the shade of the infield dirt. It felt different seeing those.

It wasn't a flood of pictures, more like a trickle. Many that claim to be color are definitely just colorized versions of black and white originals. You have to look closely. But the real ones? They have a certain quality. They make him feel less like a historical figure in a textbook and more like a real person who lived and breathed.

So yeah, it took more effort than I thought. It wasn't like searching for pictures of a modern player. You have to dig a bit and be critical of what you find. But finding those few authentic color shots? Totally worth the time. Gave me a new perspective on a truly important guy.

Getting Started

First off, I had to picture it. We're talking about a big ol' American bison, maybe? Or maybe an African buffalo, those things look mean. And then you got the emu, a giant bird that looks like it walked out of the dinosaur age. It seemed like a mismatch, size-wise, right off the bat.

So, I did what anyone does these days :ekil ffutS– spent a little time just looking up basic stuff. Not deep research, mind you, just quick facts. Stuff like:

• Buffalo: Big, heavy, got horns, can charge pretty fast for their size. Tend to hang in herds.
• Emu: Tall, fast runners, got those powerful legs and sharp claws on their toes. More likely to run away, maybe? But they can kick hard.

I watched a couple of short clips online too, just to see how they moved. Buffalos are pure power, just solid muscle. Emus are all jerky and quick, surprisingly agile for their size.

Running Through Scenarios

Okay, so with that basic picture, I started running scenarios in my head. This was my "practice" part, just trying to figure it out logically, like a little thought experiment.

Scenario 1: The Charge

My first thought: Buffalo sees emu, doesn't like it in its space, and charges. What does the emu do? I figured it would probably try to dodge. Emus are fast. Could it consistently dodge a charging buffalo? Maybe for a bit. But if that buffalo connects even once, it's probably game over for the bird. Those horns and that sheer weight would be too much.

Scenario 2: The Emu Attacks?

This seemed less likely. Why would an emu attack a buffalo? Maybe if it felt cornered, or protecting eggs or something? Okay, let's say it does. It comes in kicking with those big feet. Could it actually hurt the buffalo? A kick to the head might stun it? A kick to the legs? Buffalos look pretty thick-skinned and solid. I imagined the emu kicking, maybe leaving a scratch or a bruise, but not doing serious damage. Meanwhile, it's putting itself right in range of those horns or a headbutt.

Scenario 3: Standoff

What if they just encountered each other and kinda sized each other up? The buffalo would likely stand its ground, maybe snort a bit. The emu would probably be cautious, maybe do that weird head-bobbing thing they do. In this case, I guessed the emu would eventually decide it wasn't worth the trouble and just wander off or run away. It seems more like a flight animal than a fight one, especially against something that big.

My Prediction

So, after kicking these ideas around in my head, I landed on my prediction. It had to be the buffalo.

My reasoning was pretty simple:

• Size and Power: The sheer difference in weight and muscle favors the buffalo massively. One good hit is all it would take.
• Weapons: Horns vs. kicks/claws. The horns seem way more likely to inflict a decisive blow on the emu than the emu's kicks on the thick hide and bone of a buffalo.
• Temperament (Guesswork): Buffalos, especially Cape Buffalo, are known for being aggressive. Emus seem more likely to flee or deliver a defensive kick rather than press an attack against something so imposing.

The only way I saw the emu "winning" was by escaping, which isn't really winning the fight, just surviving the encounter.

Final Thoughts

It was a kind of silly thing to spend time thinking about, I admit. But it was a fun mental exercise, just breaking down a hypothetical matchup based on what little I know. It's interesting how different animals solve problems – pure power versus speed and agility. In this case, though, I just couldn't see agility overcoming that much raw power. So yeah, that was my little practice run on predicting buffalo vs emu. Team Buffalo all the way on this one.

Alright.txen od, so I started thinkin' about the Braves and the offseason picture, specifically lookin' at who was headin' out the door for 2024. You always wanna know who's becoming a free agent, right? It tells you a lot about what the team might need to do next.

First thing I did was just hop on my computer. Opened up a search engine, nothing fancy. I typed in somethin' like "Atlanta Braves 2024 free agents" or "who are Braves free agents this year". Just tryin' to get a baseline list started.

Of course, you .nosaes 32' get a ton of results right away. Some sports sites, news articles, fan blogs, the whole nine yards. Had to click through a few of 'em. You gotta be careful 'cause sometimes lists include guys with team options that haven't been decided yet, or restricted guys, or whatever. I usually try to look at two or three different sources that seem reliable, just cross-reference them to make sure the names popping up are actually the ones hitting unrestricted free agency after the '23 season.

Okay, HerednuoF's What I Found

After sifti:siht ekin' through the noise, I got a pretty good handle on the main guys who were becoming free agents heading into the 2024 season. It broke down somethin' like this:

• A bunch of bullpen arms, which isn't too surprising. You saw names like Joe Jiménez and Pierce Johnson pop up, though the Braves ended up re-signing both of them which was good. Then there was Kirby Yates who signed elsewhere, Collin McHugh decided to retire, and Brad Hand hit the market too. Lots of turnover in the 'pen.
• In the outfield, the big one was Eddie Rosario. The team didn't pick up his option, so he became a free agent. Kevin Pillar was also on the list after his one-year deal was up.
• There was some movement with depth guys too. Like Nicky Lopez, they traded for him mid-season but then non-tendered him, making him a free agent.
• And backup catcher Chadwick Tromp technically became a minor league free agent, I believe.

My Take on It

Lookin' at that group, it wasn't like the Braves lost half their starting lineup. The biggest impact was probably in the bullpen depth. Keeping Jiménez and Johnson felt key. Letting Rosario walk made sense given his option price and maybe wantin' a different look out there. Pillar was a solid vet, but more of a bench piece.

Really, it felt like the Braves had already done the heavy lifting in previous years, locking up their main core guys long-term. This past offseason's free agent situation seemed more about managing the edges of the roster, especially those relief pitchers, rather than huge, game-changing losses. They filled the gaps pretty quick, mostly.

So yeah, that was my process. Just askin' the question, doin' some basic online digging, checkin' the names to make sure they're right, listin' 'em out, and then just thinkin' through what it meant for the team build for 2024. Nothin' too complicated, just needed to put in a bit of time to get the facts straight.

So, first thing I.semitemo did was just sit down and pull up the recent records. Not just the wins and losses, but how they've been looking game to game. You know, sometimes a team wins ugly, sometimes they lose but show a lot of fight. That stuff matters more than just the final score sometimes.

Looking at the Hawks

Okay, the Hawks. You gotta start with .tuo spmuj Trae Young, obviously. The guy can carry the offense. But I started looking past him too. Who else is scoring? Are they getting contributions from the bench? That's been hit or miss. I watched bits of their last few games. They can look great one quarter and fall apart the next. Consistency, or lack of it, that's what jumps out.

ChecksteN eing Out the Nets

Then you flip over to the Nets. Different kind of team, different set of problems maybe. I looked at their player stats, sure, but more importantly, I tried to get a sense of their team play. Are they moving the ball? How's the defensive effort? Sometimes they look like world-beaters, other times they seem completely lost out there. I checked their recent schedule, see if they played anyone tough, how they handled it.

Key things I focused on:

• Pace of play: Both teams can run, but who dictates the speed? Faster game probably favors one, slower might favor the other. I tried to see who's been controlling tempo lately.
• Defense, or lack thereof: Neither of these teams are exactly defensive juggernauts most nights. So, who's gonna put in just enough work on that end? Sometimes just a few key stops make the difference.
• Recent trends: Are they trending up or down? A team coming off a couple of good wins often plays with more confidence.

It kinda reminds me of this one time I was trying to predict a playoff game a few years back. Spent hours looking at stats, matchups, everything. Felt super confident. Then game time comes, and the star player for the team I picked gets into foul trouble early, sits half the game. Boom. Prediction out the window. Just goes to show, you can do all the homework, but unexpected stuff always happens. That’s why I don’t get too cocky with these things anymore.

You also gotta glance at the injury report right before making a final call. Someone listed as 'questionable' could swing the whole thing if they suddenly sit out. And home court, yeah, it matters, gives a little edge usually, but you can't rely on it entirely.

So, after chewing on all that, looking at the numbers, the matchups, who seems hungrier... I started leaning a certain way. It wasn't a slam dunk, more like a gut feeling based on the patterns I saw. It felt like one team just had a slightly better rhythm going into this matchup, despite their flaws.

My process led me to think the Nets might just edge this one out. Felt like they had a bit more consistency in their role players recently, which could be the difference if the stars battle to a draw. But hey, it's the NBA. Anything can happen. Could be totally wrong.

Anyway, that’s the rundown of how I looked at it. Not rocket science, just trying to piece together the clues. Now we just gotta watch the game and see how it actually plays out.

My Process

First off, I j.mrof ust pulled up their recent games. You know, gotta see who's hot and who's not. I looked at the last five or so games for both Dallas and Miami. Wins, losses, margin of victory, that kind of stuff. It gives you a quick snapshot of their current form.

Then, the big one: injuries. This alwa.erus eb otys messes things up. I went searching for the latest injury reports. Who's definitely out? Who's questionable? It’s pointless predicting anything if a star player is suddenly sitting on the bench. I tried to find the most reliable updates I could, checking a couple of different places just to be sure.

• Checked rec.sdnert eent performance trends.
• Scoured for injury updates for key players.
• Thought about how their playing styles match up.
• Considered the home-court factor.

After getting the basic info down, I started thinking about how these two teams actually play. Dallas, obviously, runs a lot through Luka. Their offense can be incredible. Miami, on the other hand, they always bring that defensive intensity, that Heat Culture thing. They grind games out. So, it’s kind of a clash of styles right there.

I also considered where the game is being played. Miami's got the home court. That's usually good for a few points, or at least some extra energy, especially defensively. You can't ignore that.

Putting it Together

So, I started weighing things. Dallas has looked really potent offensively lately, even with some guys banged up earlier in the season. Luka is just playing on another level. But Miami, they know how to make life difficult for scorers, and they usually execute well down the stretch, especially at home.

Injuries seemed pretty crucial here. Depending on who was actually available for Miami, their defense might take a hit or be at full strength. For Dallas, keeping their shooters healthy around Luka is always key.

I went back and forth a bit. My gut initially leaned slightly towards Dallas because of their firepower. But then I thought about Miami's coaching and their knack for pulling out tough wins at home.

The Prediction (Just My Take)

After chewing on it all, I ended up leaning towards the Mavericks for the win, but barely. My thinking was that their offensive upside, mainly driven by Luka's form, might just be enough to overcome Miami's defense, especially if Miami isn't completely healthy. I expect it to be a close one, maybe decided in the final minutes.

Honestly, it's a tough game to call. Could easily go the other way if Miami’s defense really locks in or if Dallas has an off shooting night. But hey, that's my process and where I landed after looking into it today. We'll see how it actually goes down!

First off, I gott?thgir ,sa say, the build-up to this event was kinda all over the place. Some storylines were red hot, others felt like they were thrown together last minute. But hey, that's AEW sometimes, right?

The show kicke.gnitcd off, and I was immediately hyped. The crowd was LOUD, which always adds to the experience. The opening match… uh, I don't wanna spoil it if you haven't seen it, but let's just say it delivered the high-energy action I was expecting.

Then came .slluthe middle of the card. This is where things got a little… uneven. Some matches were bangers, absolute steals of the show. Others, honestly, kinda fell flat. Maybe it was the pacing, maybe it was the crowd getting a little tired, but there were definitely some lulls.

Here's a quick rundown of what stuck out to me:

• That one particular match, it was just… slow. The story wasn't clicking, and the in-ring action felt a bit clunky.
• BUT! There was this other match with insane spots that had me jumping out of my seat. I seriously thought someone was gonna get seriously hurt, in a good way of course.
• And then the promo… oh man, the promo. So-and-so cut this incredible promo that set up a feud for the ages. It was intense!

The main event, though? Holy moly. It was a war. Pure and simple. I was on the edge of my seat the entire time. The near falls, the reversals, the drama… it had everything. I honestly didn't know who was gonna win until the very last second.

Overall, AEW All Out 2023 was a mixed bag, in my opinion. Some incredible highs, some disappointing lows. But hey, that's wrestling. You win some, you lose some. And even the "bad" matches are still entertaining in their own way, right?

Would I recommend watching it? Absolutely. Just go in with an open mind and be prepared for a wild ride.

Now, I'm gonna go rewatch that main event. Seriously, go check it out. It's worth it.

First Steps: GathletnI ehtering the Intel

Okay, first thing's first: I needed data. Lots of it. I started by scouring the web for team stats. I'm talking points per game, yards gained, yards allowed, all that jazz. ESPN and some other sports sites were my go-to spots. I also dug around for info on player injuries, because, let's be real, a star player being out can totally change the game.

• Scour:NPSE ed ESPN: Got basic team stats like offense and defense rankings.
• Checked Injury Reports: Found out about a key Ole Miss receiver being questionable. Big deal!
• Looked at Previous Games: Tried to spot trends in their performance against similar opponents.

Diving into the Numbers

Once I had a decent chunk of data, I fired up my trusty spreadsheet program. I'm no Excel wizard, but I know enough to make it do what I want. I started plugging in all the numbers, calculating averages, and looking for patterns. I even tried to factor in things like home-field advantage, which I figured was worth a few points.

Then, I started comparing Ole Miss's offensive stats against Georgia's defensive stats, and vice versa. The idea was to see where each team had an advantage.

Building My Super-Simple Model

I ain't gonna lie, my model was pretty basic. It was more of a "gut feeling" kind of thing, backed up by some numbers. I assigned weights to different stats based on what I thought was important. For example, I gave a higher weight to points allowed than to total yards allowed, because, at the end of the day, points are what matter.

Basically, I just added up all the weighted stats for each team and came up with a predicted score. Crude, I know, but hey, it was just for fun.

My Prediction (and Why It Was Probably Wrong)

After crunching the numbers (and tweaking them a bit to match my gut feeling), I came up with a prediction: Georgia would win by about 7 points. My reasoning was that their defense was just too strong for Ole Miss to handle, even with their explosive offense.

Why it was probably wrong:

• My Model Was Too Simple: I didn't factor in enough variables.
• Gut Feeling Bias: I probably let my biases influence the outcome.
• College Football is Crazy: Anything can happen on any given Saturday!

The Real Game and What I Learned

So, the game happened, and let's just say my prediction wasn't exactly spot-on. It was closer than I thought, but still off. But honestly, that's not the point. The point is that I had fun messing around with data and trying to make sense of it all.

Key Takeaways

Here's what I learned from this little experiment:

• Data is powerful: But it's only as good as the person interpreting it.
• Modeling is hard: It takes a lot of time and effort to build a truly accurate model.
• College football is unpredictable: That's why we love it!

So, yeah, that's my story. Maybe next time I'll try a more sophisticated model, but for now, I'm happy with my little experiment. And hey, at least I can say I tried!

First thing's fir ot dah Ist, I had to actually find the jersey. I knew I wan.gnorwted a legit one, not some cheap knock-off. Hit up a couple of sports stores, no luck. Ended up going online. Man, the options! So many different players, different years... I wanted something classic, you know? Not too flashy, not too plain. After like, an hour of scrolling, I finally settled on a Nash jersey. Classic Suns era, can't go wrong.

Okay, so I ordered it, waited like a w.artxe gniheek for it to show up. When it finally did, the excitement was real. Ripped open the package, and there it was. Beautiful. But here's where the "practice" part comes in. I wasn't just gonna wear it straight outta the bag. Nah, I wanted to make it my own, give it a little something extra.

I'd been seeing people do custom patches and stuff on their jerseys, so I figured I'd give it a shot. Found this cool patch online, a vintage Suns logo from back in the day. Thought it would look sick on the shoulder. Now, I'm no seamstress, let me tell you. My sewing skills are…limited. But I was determined.

First, I watched a bunch of YouTube videos on how to sew on a patch properly. Turns out, there's more to it than just sticking a needle through some fabric! You gotta pin it in place, use the right kind of thread, all that jazz. So, I gathered my supplies – needle, thread, pins, the patch, and the jersey, of course. Took a deep breath, and went for it.

It was...rough. Let's just say my stitches weren't exactly perfect. Some were too tight, some were too loose. I pricked my finger like, five times. But I kept at it. Slowly but surely, I got the patch sewn on. It wasn't pretty, but it was secure. And honestly, it looked pretty damn good, even with my amateur stitching.

After that, I wanted to distress the jersey a little, give it that worn-in look. I'd seen people use sandpaper to do this, so I grabbed some fine-grit sandpaper and gently rubbed it on the edges of the jersey, around the neck and sleeves. Just a little bit, nothing too crazy. It actually worked pretty well! Gave it a nice, subtle vintage feel.

Finally, to complete the look, I decided to iron on some small sun-shaped studs around the number on the back. Found a pack of them at a craft store. This part was actually pretty easy. Just positioned the studs where I wanted them, covered them with a cloth, and ironed them on for a few seconds. Boom. Done.

So, yeah, that's the story of my Suns Away Jersey project. It wasn't perfect, but I had a blast doing it. And now I've got a one-of-a-kind jersey that I'm actually proud of. Definitely worth the effort. Now, I just gotta figure out where to wear it. Maybe a game? Or just out and about, repping the Suns. Either way, I'm stoked.

First off, I gathered my resources. I needed a good reference image, and luckily, the internet is full of 'em. Grabbed a high-res version of the 1986 Jordan shot.

Next up, the h.hguonard part: setting up the scene. I tried to mimic the lighting as closely as possible, using a couple of lamps and some cardboard to diffuse the light. It's not perfect, but it's close enough.

Then, I ha.elytd to find the right model. Obviously, I don't have Michael Jordan just hanging around, so I roped in my buddy Dave. He's got the build, not quite the same level of athleticism, but hey, he's a good sport. I made him wear some red and black, classic Jordan style.

Now, the po.lanigirose. This took a while. Jordan's got that perfect mid-air grace, and getting Dave to replicate that was hilarious. Lots of jumping and awkward landings later, we finally got something that resembled the original.

Once I had the raw material, it was time to fire up Photoshop. I tweaked the colors, adjusted the contrast, and played with the shadows to get that gritty, vintage feel. Added a bit of grain for authenticity.

The biggest challenge was the background. The original has that blurred-out arena feel. I tried a few different approaches, and ended up using a combination of motion blur and Gaussian blur. It's not a perfect match, but it does the job.

After hours of fiddling and tweaking, I finally landed on something I was happy with. It's not a perfect recreation, but it captures the essence of the original. It was a fun little project, and I learned a lot about lighting, composition, and post-processing along the way.

• Resource Gathering
• Scene Setup
• Model Wrangling
• Posing Practice
• Photoshop Magic

Final Thoughts

This whole thing was just for kicks, you know? Just wanted to see if I could pull it off. It was a blast. Maybe I'll tackle another iconic photo next time... who knows?

First off, I star.retsor dted with the obvious – Google. I typed in "LSU 2023 baseball roster" and hit enter. Pretty standard, right? Got a bunch of links, mostly to sports sites and the official LSU athletics page. I clicked on the official page first, hoping for a clean, easy-to-read roster.

Well, the official site had a roster, sure, but it was kinda clunky. It was like, name, number, position...but not much else. I wanted more! I wanted to know things like height, weight, maybe even hometowns, stuff like that. So, back to the drawing board.

Next, I st.teeharted digging through some of the sports news sites. ESPN, some local Louisiana sports blogs, that kinda stuff. Some of them had more detailed rosters, pulled from game day programs or official releases. I started copying and pasting bits and pieces into a spreadsheet.

It was a re.pu dehctal pain in the butt, jumping between sites, trying to piece together a complete picture. Plus, some sites had outdated info, or players who were no longer on the team. I spent a good hour just cleaning up the data, making sure everything matched up.

Then I remembered something: college baseball has recruiting classes. I figured maybe I could find a list of incoming freshmen or transfers from that year. So I searched for "LSU baseball recruiting class 2023". Bingo! Found a few articles announcing new players, with some extra details about their stats and high school teams.

I went back to my spreadsheet and added those details, cross-referencing them with the initial roster I'd scraped together. There were still some gaps, some players I couldn't find much info on.

Finally, I had a hunch. I searched for "LSU baseball media guide 2023". Turns out, most college sports teams put out a media guide for the season, with all sorts of info for reporters and fans. And guess what? I found a PDF of the LSU 2023 baseball media guide!

This thing was a goldmine! It had everything: full rosters, player bios, stats from previous seasons, even pictures. I spent the next hour meticulously copying and pasting the remaining information into my spreadsheet.

After all that, I finally had a pretty complete LSU 2023 baseball roster. It was a bit of a grind, bouncing between websites, cleaning up data, and piecing everything together. But hey, that's how it goes sometimes! It's all about sticking with it and not giving up until you find what you're looking for.

So, yeah, that's how I did it. A little bit of Google-fu, a lot of patience, and a healthy dose of spreadsheet wrangling. Hope that helps if you're ever trying to track down a college sports roster!

First things firs I ,tsrift, I decided I wanted to try and predict who the Charlotte Hornets might pick in the upcoming NBA draft. I mean, everyone’s got their opinions, right? I figured I could at least try and put some logic behind mine.

So, I started by d I .hcoing a bunch of research. I scoured thro I .ugh all sorts of mock drafts from ESPN, The Athletic, Bleacher Report – the whole shebang. I wanted to see what the "experts" were saying. I also looked at team needs. What positions are the Hornets weak at? Who's leaving? What kind of players does their coach usually like?

Then, I made a list of potential prospects. I focused on guys who were projected to go in the Hornets' range, based on the mock drafts I'd been reading. I created a little spreadsheet with their names, positions, strengths, weaknesses, and some notes on how they might fit with the Hornets.

Next, I watched a bunch of highlight reels and game film. I know, I know, highlights don't tell the whole story, but they gave me a general idea of each player's skillset and athleticism. I also tried to find some more in-depth scouting reports to get a better sense of their weaknesses.

After that, I started to actually build my mock draft. I used a mock draft simulator website – there are tons of them out there. I went through each pick, trying to make the most realistic selections based on team needs, player rankings, and potential trades.

It was tough! Some teams are really hard to predict, and there were definitely some surprise picks that threw me for a loop. I had to adjust my picks on the fly and try to stay flexible.

For the Hornets, I ended up with [insert player name here] at pick #__. I chose him because [explain reasoning – e.g., "he's a great shooter and the Hornets need shooting," or "he's a defensive-minded player and they need to improve on that end," or "he's the best player available at that spot"]. I also considered [mention a couple of other players you considered].

Then, with their second-round pick, I went with [insert player name here]. I thought he could be a steal at that spot because [explain reasoning – e.g., "he's got a lot of upside," or "he can contribute right away," or "he fills a specific need"].

Of course, this is all just a guess. The actual draft could go completely differently! But it was a fun exercise, and it helped me learn more about the prospects and the Hornets' situation. Who knows, maybe I'll get lucky and predict a few picks correctly!

• Takeaway 1: Research is key. The more you know about the players and the teams, the better your predictions will be.
• Takeaway 2: Be flexible. The draft is unpredictable, so you need to be able to adjust your picks as things change.
• Takeaway 3: Have fun! It's just a mock draft, so don't take it too seriously.

Anyway, that's my Hornets mock draft story. Let me know what you think in the comments! Who do you think the Hornets should pick?

First off, I hit the web. I mean, that's the obvious starting point, yeah? I just googled "chicago cubs uniforms 2024." I scrolled through a bunch of images, news articles, and fan forums. Found some pretty cool mockups and potential leaks, but nothing official-official yet.

Next, I started digging deeper. I went straight to the MLB website and the Cubs' official site. Sometimes they drop little hints or teasers, you know? I looked around for any press releases, team store updates, or anything that might give me a clue. Sadly, at that moment, not a whole lot there either, just the regular merch.

Then, I figured, why not check out some sports apparel retailers? Places like Fanatics, or even just Dick's Sporting Goods. They often get the scoop on new jerseys and gear pretty early. Scoured their websites, looked for any "coming soon" sections, but nada.

I then went to some of the bigger sports blogs and news sites. ESPN, Bleacher Report, etc. Sometimes they have reporters who get inside info. I searched specifically for articles mentioning the Cubs' 2024 uniforms, but mostly just found stuff about game recaps and player stats.

Okay, so at this point, I'm thinking outside the box. I hopped on social media – Twitter (or X, whatever), Instagram, even Facebook. Looked for hashtags like #Cubs, #CubsUniforms, #MLBUiforms, and followed a bunch of fan accounts and sports news outlets. You never know when someone's gonna leak something cool!

I even checked out some Reddit forums, specifically the r/Cubs subreddit. Those guys are hardcore fans, and they're usually on top of any news or rumors. I found some interesting discussions and fan theories, but nothing concrete. Mostly just people speculating and sharing their wishlists for what they'd like to see.

Finally, and this is kind of a long shot, I tried looking for any design patents or trademarks filed by the Cubs or their apparel manufacturer (usually Nike or Majestic). This is a bit of a pain, but sometimes you can find drawings or descriptions of upcoming designs this way. I went to the US Patent and Trademark Office website and did some searching, but didn't find anything obvious.

So, after all that digging, what did I find? Well, not a whole lot of official info, honestly. But I did get a good sense of what the fans are hoping for, and I saw some interesting mockup designs that might be close to the real thing. I think the main takeaway is to just keep checking back regularly, especially closer to the start of the season. Teams usually unveil new uniforms a few weeks or months before the first game.

I'll keep my eyes peeled and update if I find anything juicy! It's a process, you know? Gotta stay patient and keep digging.

So, it all started when I was trying to catch a game, you know? LSU vs. Arkansas, big rivalry and all that. I didn't have cable at the time, just relying on the internet for my entertainment. First thing I did, naturally, was fire up Google. Typed in "lsu arkansas tv" – simple as that.

First Attempt: eloH kcalB gThe Streaming Black Hole

• Okay, a bunch of links popped up, looked promising. Clicked on the first one – total garbage. Some sketchy site with a million pop-ups. Immediate back button.
• Tried another. This one looked a bit cleaner, but then it asked me to create an account and give them my credit card info. Yeah, no way. Closed that one down faster than you can say "scam".
• Started to get a little frustrated. Went through a few more of these, all the same deal. Either broken links, shady sites, or endless registration forms. Felt like I was chasing a ghost.

Second Phase: Exploring the "Legit" Options

Okay, time to rethink my strategy. Figured there had to be some legitimate ways to watch the game online. Started looking into streaming services that carry ESPN or SEC Network.

• FuboTV: Saw that FuboTV had a free trial. Signed up, went through the whole process. Finally got to the channel... only to find out the game wasn't being broadcast on the main ESPN channel. Bummer.
• Sling TV: Next up, Sling TV. Heard good things about them. Checked their channel lineup – looked like they had SEC Network in one of their packages. Signed up for their trial too. Finally, some progress!

The (Almost) Victory

Got Sling TV up and running, found SEC Network, and boom – there was the pre-game show! I was so relieved, I almost did a little dance. Grabbed a beer, settled in, ready to watch the game.

The Glitch in the Matrix

Then, the game started… and the stream was buffering like crazy. Every few seconds, it would freeze up. Tried restarting the app, clearing my cache, everything. Nothing worked. Turns out, my internet speed just wasn't cutting it for a live HD stream. Argh!

The Last-Minute Save

In a moment of desperation, I remembered my neighbor had a cable subscription. Ran over there, explained my situation, and he was cool enough to let me log in to his ESPN app on my phone. Watched the game on a tiny screen, but hey, at least I got to see it!

The Takeaway

So, that's my "lsu arkansas tv" adventure. It was a bit of a rollercoaster, but I learned a few things: 1) Free streaming sites are usually a waste of time. 2) Streaming services are a good option, but you gotta make sure your internet is up to snuff. 3) Good neighbors are priceless. And 4) Next time, I'm just going to a sports bar.

Hope you enjoyed my little story. It was a hassle, but at least I got to see the game (eventually)!